A Technician’s Role in the Treatment of Demodex Patients
Demodicosis is a common disease in small animal veterinary practice with a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic options.
First described in 1842 by Gustav Simon, a French dermatologist, Demodex mites are normal skin inhabitants of many mammals, and >140 species of Demodex have been identified (2 in humans, 3 in dogs).1 The mites live in hair follicles as well as the sebaceous glands and ducts and feed off of sebum, cells, and debris from the epidermis.2,3 In dogs, the mites are passed from the bitch to her puppies through close contact while nursing. Transfer of mites is noted on the pups as early as 16 hours4 but usually takes place within the first 2 to 3 days after birth.2,3 Puppies born via cesarian section that have no contact with their mother to nurse will not have Demodex mites.2,4
Although Demodex are considered normal fauna of the skin, collecting samples to assess their presence does not usually yield any mites. Thus, when mites are noted on diagnostic samples, the patient is considered to have a degree of demodicosis.2,4
The Demodex life cycle has 4 stages: (1) egg (fusiform or lemon shaped), (2) larva (3 pairs of legs), (3) nymph (4 pairs of legs), and (4) adult (4 pairs of legs and breastplates)2 (FIGURES 1 and 2).
From egg to adult, the Demodex life cycle takes 20 to 35 days.2 Mites have three body sections: (1) the gnathosoma (jaws or cranial portion), (2) the podosoma (legs or middle portion), and (3) the opisthosoma (tail or caudal portion).4 The penis and vulva are hidden within the legs.
Three species of Demodex mites have been identified in dogs. Demodex canis is the most common. In the 1990s, a mite later named Demodex injai (FIGURE 3) was noted to have a longer tail than D. canis. D. injai is commonly found in terrier breeds, but usually in low numbers. The mites cause a greasy dermatitis (seborrhea oleosa) along the dorsum over the spine2 and have also been associated with intense facial pruritus (itch).4 Because it is caused by relatively few mites, folliculitis secondary to D. injai demodicosis may be subtle in presentation, making a diagnosis based on clinical observation more difficult. A third mite, unofficially named Demodex cornei, was first described in dogs in the 1980s and seems to be a morphologic variant of D. canis. D. cornei has a shorter tail than D. canis; it is approximately one-half to one-third the length of the opisthosoma section.2 Additionally, this mite favors living in the more superficial structures of the stratum corneum of the skin. Different species may be found on the same patient concurrently2–4 (FIGURE 4).
Some breed predilections exist for demodicosis. Short-coated breeds such as English bulldogs (FIGURE 5), Staffordshire terriers, and Boston terriers, along with longer-coated breeds such as shih tzus, West Highland White terriers, and Scottish terriers, seem to be predisposed.2,4 In Chinese Shar-Peis, skin thickness may make finding the mites on a deep skin scraping difficult, and diagnosis may require obtaining skin biopsy samples for histopathology (see DIAGNOSIS).2,4,5 Additional predisposing factors are listed in BOX 1. Iatrogenic administration of glucocorticoids and subsequent suppression of the immune system has great potential as an influencing factor in demodicosis.
Demodex infections in dogs are classified as either juvenile onset (dogs younger than 18 months) or adult onset (dogs older than 4 years)2 and are further categorized as localized or generalized. For patients between 18 months and 4 years old, a thorough dermatologic history is necessary to determine which category of demodicosis is more likely in this age range. While dogs that recover fully from juvenile demodicosis may live healthy lives with no recurrence of infection, it is possible that such dogs have a chronic predisposition to demodicosis even into adulthood. The reason for this is not fully understood, but abnormalities in cell-mediated immunity are postulated.1 Gathering a detailed history is also important for categorizing the type of demodicosis (i.e., juvenile versus adult onset). To date, D. injai have been noted only in adult-onset disease.3
Categorizing demodicosis as localized versus generalized depends on the number and/or location of body sites affected. Localized demodicosis is defined as 1 to 5 sites affected that usually include the face (particularly the periorbital region and lip/muzzle), forelimbs, or ears (otitis externa); however, any site on the animal can be affected. Localized demodicosis commonly develops between 3 and 6 months of age and generally resolves without treatment in 6 to 8 weeks.2,4 Dogs with a history of localized demodicosis may be predisposed to develop demodicosis later in life, particularly immunocompromised animals.3 Generalized demodicosis may begin as many small, localized lesions that progress to cover a large body area. When evidence of Demodex is detected in 6 or more focal lesions, completely involves 2 or more paws, or involves an entire body region (such as the face), the infection is categorized as generalized.2
Other presentations of demodicosis include lesions solely affecting the paws (pododemodicosis). Pododemodicosis may be part of generalized demodicosis or be the only lesions present. When it is part of generalized demodicosis, pododemodicosis may persist despite appropriate therapy, even if resolution of other affected areas is noted. Commonly, nodules and furuncles (swollen and ruptured hair follicles) are formed with pododemodicosis (FIGURE 6), particularly in English bulldogs.2 As mentioned earlier, D. canis or D. injai mites can be found in the external ear canals. Ceruminous (waxy) exudate is usually present and may also induce pruritus for the pet. This presentation may occur by itself or as part of generalized demodicosis.5
Demodicosis is one of 3 differentials to consider when areas of folliculitis (inflammation of the hair follicle) are observed on the skin; the others are bacterial and dermatophyte infections. Lesions associated with folliculitis are listed in BOX 2.
After obtaining a thorough dermatologic and medical history, including exposure to immunosuppressive medications, particularly steroids, a dermatologic database of cytology, deep skin scraping (or alternative collection method), and dermatophyte culture should be completed to rule in/out folliculitis differentials. These diagnostic tests can be performed in the veterinary clinic setting—often by veterinary technicians under the direction of a veterinarian. Demodex infection, particularly adult-onset demodicosis, is usually accompanied by pyoderma, making cytology and deep skin scraping necessary in most patients. It is important to remember that dermatophyte exposure is common in young animals because of their living situations (e.g., puppy mill, pet store, shelter) and in immunocompromised adult dogs. This reinforces the importance of always considering the possibility of the triad of folliculitis infections (bacteria, Demodex, dermatophyte) in some at-risk patients (FIGURE 7).
When determining whether Demodex mites are present, a deep skin scraping is typically performed. Several areas (4 to 6 sites) should be sampled in patients with generalized demodicosis; in patients with localized demodicosis, samples should be collected from each lesion. These areas should be re-scraped at subsequent visits to assess response to therapy. Details about the sampled areas need to be documented (clearly identified and quantified) in the medical record.
To avoid transfer of bloodborne disease or pathogens between patients, a new or autoclaved #10 scalpel blade should be used to perform skin scraping in each patient. The blade may be dulled before scraping the animal by running the cutting edge across a metal surface such as a stainless steel examination table. Alternatively, a skin scraping spatula may be used. The advantage to using a spatula is that, when performing a deep scraping, it is not so sharp that it will potentially cut the patient.6 A glass microscope slide is prepared by applying a heavy drop of mineral oil, and the blade or spatula is dipped in the oil before scraping the patient. This eases the friction between the blade and skin during the sampling process and promotes collecting and trapping the material to be evaluated.
Skin scraping is then performed in the following steps:
- Using the thumb and index or middle finger, pinch the selected area of skin to be sampled and then release it. The purpose of this action is to facilitate extrusion of the mites from the hair follicles, thereby enhancing the quality of the collected sample. Keeping the skin pinched during scraping is not recommended because it (1) may result in further discomfort to the patient, (2) promotes scraping more deeply than intended, and (3) places one’s fingers in proximity to a very sharp tool.
- Using the nondominant hand, spread the skin taut (FIGURE 8).
- Position the edge of the blade perpendicular to the skin or slightly angled away from the direction of scraping. Use light, steady pressure while scraping against the skin in the direction of hair growth. Only scrape a small area to minimize patient discomfort and to decrease the amount of skin damage after sample collection. The skin may bruise during the procedure; however, continue scraping until blood is visible on the blade. Premature cessation of scraping before a small amount of blood is observed on the blade may lead to a false-negative result.
- After blood is detected, pinch the scraped area again to enhance capillary oozing.
- Use the scalpel blade for one final sweeping scrape to collect a generous amount of mineral oil, skin debris, and blood for the diagnostic sample.
- Transfer as much of the collected sample as possible to the prepared slide. The most effective method is to pick up the glass slide with one hand and use the other to swirl the blade in the oil and rub the blade’s edge on the side of the slide. Placing a coverslip on top of the sample is recommended to ensure the entire area within the borders of the coverslip is assessed.
A trichogram can be used to evaluate regions that may be too painful or too risky to scrape without chemical restraint. This includes areas near the eye (FIGURE 9), the mouth, the feet of small breeds, and over the thin skin of the axilla and abdomen.2,4,5 Samples are collected by grasping the hair with hemostats and quickly plucking the hair in the direction of hair growth. They are then placed in mineral oil on a glass slide and a cover slip applied. This method may not be as sensitive as a deep skin scraping but is still informative and can confirm a diagnosis.
Acetate Tape and Squeeze
This technique involves using a piece of clear acetate tape that is slightly shorter in length than a glass microscope slide. The tape is firmly applied to the selected area of skin to be sampled. The skin under the tape is then pinched or squeezed (using fingers) to extrude the mites from the hair follicles; the mites will stick to the tape. The tape is then placed on a glass microscope slide to be evaluated by microscopy.6,7
For a pet with localized demodicosis of the ear, the mites may be seen when an ear swab is rolled in mineral oil on the slide and the collected material covered with a cover slip, just as is seen with Otodectes cytology preps. Secondary otitis externa complicated with Malassezia and/or bacteria is common, and a separate stained slide should be prepared.
Demodex mites are readily visualized under the microscope using the 4× objective lens; however, the 10× lens is recommended to enhance ease of detection of both mites and eggs. As when reading a fecal sample, the light condenser should be lowered and the light intensity reduced to enhance contrast between mites and skin debris. Skeletons of dead mites do not refract intense light as well as live mites (FIGURE 10), and this can lead to a false-negative interpretation that may result in premature cessation of treatment and recurrence of disease.2,4
When Demodex mites are observed, the quantity of each life stage should be documented. For example, results of a skin scraping may be reported to the veterinarian as 8 dead adults, 4 live adults, 2 nymphs, 1 larva, and 1 egg. This is necessary to assess response to the chosen treatment, which is continued over several weeks to months before the dog is deemed cured. If juvenile stages of the Demodex mite are recognized after previous scrapings had revealed only dead adults, a further exploration of the patient’s history is needed. Perhaps a young dog has outgrown the therapeutic dosing range of the chosen treatment, an owner has discontinued the medication because of the improvement noted, or a concurrent disease process is allowing the relapse. It is important to remember that a clinical cure (how the dog’s skin appears) is noted before the actual or microscopic cure.2 Veterinary technicians may need to remind owners about the importance of continuing therapy to prevent a relapse, even if their dog appears “cured.”
In some cases, skin inflammation is severe enough to impede diagnosis via deep skin scraping techniques. These patients include dogs with nodular pododemodicosis and Shar-Peis with excessive mucin within the dermis. For these animals, diagnosis via biopsy and histopathology is required. A 6- or 8-mm punch biopsy tool is used to collect multiple samples of affected skin. Mites are readily identified within the hair follicles on histopathologic evaluation2–4 (FIGURE 11).
Several treatment options are available for demodicosis. Young puppies with localized disease may receive no treatment at all, as these infections are expected to spontaneously resolve as the puppy grows and its immune system matures. Most cases, however, do require treatment, and many medications are available to kill the mites. Miticidal therapy is continued 4 weeks beyond obtaining negative results of at least 2 scrapings performed 3 to 4 weeks apart.3,8 Demodicosis may relapse for several reasons, including exposure to immunosuppressive medications, estrus/parturition, or concurrent diseases. If folliculitis lesions recur, the first step is to repeat a deep skin scrape. A patient is declared cured from the current infection if there is no relapse of demodicosis for more than 12 months after miticidal therapy is discontinued.2
Roles of the Veterinary Technician
Veterinary technicians play several essential roles in diagnosing demodicosis:
- Collecting and assessing samples. Veterinary technicians are most likely to perform these procedures, and being proficient in them not only illustrates practicing quality medicine but also financially benefits the veterinary practice.
- Documentation and consistency. To ensure the medical record is complete and thorough, sample sites must be documented, as those same areas will be resampled at each recheck visit. As the dog clinically improves and the hair grows back, scrapings may be more difficult to collect. In these cases, it may be necessary to shave a small window over the previously sampled sites to obtain an acceptable sample. The numbers of eggs, larvae, nymphs, and adults identified on each sample must be recorded, and adult mites should further be classified as live or dead.
- Monitoring. It is important to weigh the pet at each visit, especially young, growing dogs that may outgrow the therapeutic range of the prescribed miticide.
- Client communication. Having open and direct communication with owners helps ensure that they are correctly continuing the directed treatment protocol and improves the likelihood for successful outcomes. Such discussions may reveal that owners have discontinued medications because their pet appears clinically improved or dislikes taking the medication. Two critical aspects of the job of veterinary technicians are to reinforce the veterinarian’s recommendations and to confirm that owners clearly understand the treatment protocol. Important topics to address include client understanding of the medication’s purposes, doses, and side effects, as well as treatment duration and financial expectations. Our ability to convey a deep understanding of the disease process, treatment protocol, and prognosis greatly enhances clients’ experiences and positive outcomes for each case.
- Ferrer L, Ravera I, Silbermayr K. Immunology and pathogenesis of canine demodicosis. Vet Dermatol 2014;25(5):427-e65. doi: 10.1111/vde.12136.
- Miller WH, Griffin CE, Campbell KL. Muller & Kirk’s Small Animal Dermatology. 7th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2012:304-313.
- Hnilica KA. Small Animal Dermatology: A Color Atlas and Therapeutic Guide. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2011:123-131.
- Jackson HA, Marsella R (eds). BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Dermatology, 3rd ed. Quedgeley, Gloucester, England: British Small Animal Veterinary Association; 2012:164-172.
- Tater K, Shell L. Demodectic Mange. Veterinary Information Network, Inc. (VIN) updated 2/2013 by Tater K (2008—Snell original author), Davis, CA. vin.com/Members/Associate/Associate.plx?from=GetDzInfo&DiseaseId=272.
- Deboer D. Skin scraping for external parasites. Clinicians Brief April 2016:43-47.
- Pereira AV, Pereira SA, Gremião ID, et al. Comparison of acetate tape impression with squeezing versus skin scraping for the diagnosis of canine demodicosis. Aust Vet J 2012;90(11):448-450.
- Ferrer L. Demodicosis: treatment of difficult and desperate cases. Proc 8th World Cong Vet Dermatol 2016:108-111.